Published in
Taylor & Francis (Routledge), Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2(31), p. 148-159
DOI: 10.1080/01973530902880456
Links
Tools
In-Group Favoritism in International Justice Concerns: Power, Involvement, and Attitudes toward the Iraq War and the Cross Straits Relationship in Five Societies
,
Li-Li Huang,
Glenn Adams,
Fei-Xue Wang,
Tomohide Atsumi,
James H. Liu;Katja Hanke;Ronald Fischer;Li Li Huang;Glenn Adams;Fei xue Wang;Tomohide Atsumi;Walter J. Lonner,
Walter J. Lonner
Full text: Download
Abstract
2080111010012 ; 學習科學研究所 ; Surveys in the USA, New Zealand, Taiwan, Japan, and China examined attitudes toward the Iraq War and the Cross-Straits Relationship between China and Taiwan. Factor analyses revealed a four-factor solution of justice concerns: (a) national mandate for military intervention, (b) international mandate against military action, (c) procedural justice, and (d) distributive justice issues. Americans and mainland Chinese were significantly different in an in-group favoring direction compared to other societies regarding justice concerns involving their nation. Taiwan, the low-powered society in the Cross-Straits Relationship, was like the uninvolved societies. Justice in international relations is filtered through in-group favoritism for powerful states.