Published in

Cambridge University Press, British Journal of Psychiatry, 01(210), p. 24-30

DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.179093

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The evidence-practice gap in specialist mental healthcare: systematic review and meta-analysis of guideline implementation studies

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are not easily implemented, leading to a gap between research synthesis and their use in routine care. AIMS: To summarise the evidence relating to the impact of guideline implementation on provider performance and patient outcomes in mental healthcare settings, and to explore the performance of different strategies for guideline implementation. METHOD: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and before-and-after studies comparing guideline implementation strategies v. usual care, and different guideline implementation strategies, in patients with severe mental illness. RESULTS: In total, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies did not show a consistent positive effect of guideline implementation on provider performance, but a more consistent small to modest positive effect on patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline implementation does not seem to have an impact on provider performance, nonetheless it may influence patient outcomes positively.