Published in

Royal Society of Chemistry, Green Chemistry, 23(18), p. 6157-6159

DOI: 10.1039/c6gc90109c

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Appropriate lifetimes, fitting deaths

Journal article published in 2016 by Jl Scott ORCID, Jacquetta Lee
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The principle “Chemical products should be designed so that at the end of their function they do not persist in the environment and break down into innocuous degradation products”, that appears 10th in the original list of “Principles of Green Chemistry” (Fig. 1), published by Anastas and Warner,1 must remain part of the fundamental basis of green chemistry. Consider the definition of two key words: principle – “a primary assumption forming the basis of a chain of reasoning”2 and chemistry – “the branch of science concerned with the substances of which matter is composed, the investigation of their properties and reactions, and the use of such reactions to form new substances”. 3 Clearly any practitioner of chemistry that purports to be ‘green’, must consider the end fate of the substances that are created and endeavour to ensure that these ultimately “do no net harm” (to borrow from the Hippocratian tradition of modern medicine, as interpreted by Sokol4).