Published in

Cambridge University Press, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 04(4), p. 634

DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300007716

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

New Tools for the Herpes Virologist

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Herpes viruses are responsible for a wide spectrum of infections ranging from cold sores, genital herpes, and chicken pox to disseminated herpes infections in normal and more commonly in immunocompromised patients. Symptoms range from mildly distressing and uncomfortable to severe and life-threatening. The sophistication of virological methods is increasing. Specific types, classes, and subclasses of antibodies to viruses can now be determined, as well as the reactivity of T-lymphocytes. It is possible to detect herpes virus type-specific antibodies (to HSV-l or HSV-2) in a blood sample using the simple and inexpensive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The virus is usually type-determined rapidly and currently susceptibility or resistance to antiviral compounds can be defined in vitro. Such assays of antiviral resistance have been shown to be quick and effective. Effective antiviral therapies have been developed against a number of viral diseases. The concomitant need for isolation and evaluation of resistance patterns of herpes virus against different antiviral compounds appears to be of considerable importance. Pure clinical observations are no longer sufficient to distinguish the types, since HSV-l may be present in the genital region and HSV-2 at upper parts of the body–contrary to common belief.