Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Taylor & Francis (Routledge), Death Studies, 8(38), p. 510-516

DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2013.873839

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Public Attitudes About Normal and Pathological Grief

Journal article published in 2014 by Emma L. Penman, Lauren J. Breen ORCID, Lauren Y. Hewitt, Holly G. Prigerson
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Determining public expectations of grief is an important contributor to the debate differentiating normal from pathological grief. An international sample of 348 participants was randomly allocated to 1 of 12 conditions comprising a bereavement vignette and self-report items measuring grief expectations and social distance. Participants expected grief to decrease steadily between 2 weeks and 6 months then stabilize; however, time did not affect social distance. Gender of the bereaved and circumstances of death did not influence expectations, but did interact to influence social distance. These factors must be accounted for in determining a deviation from the norm in diagnostic nosology.