Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Royal Society of Chemistry, Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 3(12), p. 681-688, 2010

DOI: 10.1039/b914962g

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Environmental versus dietary exposure to POPs and metals: A probabilistic assessment of human health risks

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The human health risks derived from the multipathway/multipollutant exposure to various chemicals were assessed in an area with significant petrochemical activity (Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain). Environmental exposure to several Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) (PCDD/Fs, PCBs, PCNs, and PAHs) and metals (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Mn, Pb, and V) was determined and compared with the dietary intake of these pollutants. The mean environmental exposure to organic pollutants ranged from 6.36 x 10(-6) ng WHO-TEQ kg(-1) day(-1) to 3.34 ng kg(-1) day(-1) for PCDD/Fs and PAHs, respectively. In turn, the minimum and maximum values of environmental exposure to metals corresponded to Cd (9.35 x 10(-8) mg kg(-1) day(-1)) and Mn (8.72 x 10(-5) mg kg(-1) day(-1)), respectively. Among the environmental exposure pathways, dermal absorption and soil ingestion were the most important pathways for POPs and metals, respectively. However, this exposure was notably lower than the dietary intake of these contaminants, with percentages of <2% for most of them. Considering cumulative effects, the current concentrations of micropollutants do not mean significant additional non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic human health risks. Notwithstanding, in order to consider the synergistic/antagonistic effects according to the target organ or mode-of-action, the development of alternative methodologies of risk assessment are necessary for a more accurate evaluation.