Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Royal Society of Chemistry, Journal of Materials Chemistry C Materials for optical and electronic devices, 45(2), p. 9701-9711, 2014

DOI: 10.1039/c4tc01072h

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Modelling the luminescence of extended solids: an example of a highly luminescent MCM-41 impregnated with a Eu<sup>3+</sup>β-diketonate complex

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The regular MCM-41 type mesostructured silica material was used as a support for the incorporation of the highly luminescent tris(beta-diketonate) complex Eu(tta)3ephen yielding the hybrid MCM-Eu material. Suitable characterization by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analyses (TGA), diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS), 13C and 21Si solid state NMR spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy was accomplished. The combination of Ultraviolet-Visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis) and photoluminescence techniques shows that this incorporation seems to modify essentially the second Eu3+ coordination shell. For a material that has a simply impregnated lanthanide complex, the herein reported maximum 5D0 quantum yield (q) value of 0.31 is a significant high value, being almost in the same scale of the values obtained for the materials with covalently bonded complexes. A detailed theoretical photoluminescence study of the MCM-Eu with the recently developed Luminescence Package- LUMPAC is presented. The high accuracy of the theoretical calculations is achieved through the comparison with the experimental values. Aiming at a deeper understanding of the photoluminescence process, the ligand-to-Eu3+ intramolecular energy transfer and back–transfer rates were also predicted. The dominant pathway involves the energy transfer between the lowest energy ligand triplet and the 5D0 level (9.70 ×107 s-1).