Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Taylor & Francis (Routledge), The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 6(22), p. 885-894

DOI: 10.1080/14789949.2011.607509

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Labelling people who are resident in a secure forensic mental health service: user views.

Journal article published in 2011 by Geoffrey Dickens, Amanda Lange, Marco Picchioni ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

There has been considerable debate about the terms that mental health service providers use to refer to the people who are resident in their services. Some have argued that the labels used to refer to people can be stigmatising or empowering, but no study has examined the views of users of secure psychiatric services. This study aimed to establish preference for terminology among a sample of people resident in three secure hospitals. A survey of 100 randomly selected individuals, stratified to ensure gender representativeness, was conducted. ‘Patient’ was the preferred term of 42% of respondents; ‘client’ (20%), ‘service user’ (17%) and ‘consumer’ (2%) were less popular. Preference did not vary by gender, age, diagnosis, legal status, ethnicity, security level or length of stay. On the basis of preference alone, there is no case for rejection of the term ‘patient’ in secure mental health service provider communication and literature.