Published in

Royal Society of Chemistry, Catalysis Science & Technology, 2(6), p. 521-529, 2016

DOI: 10.1039/c5cy01174d

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparative study of bioethanol transformation catalyzed by Ru or Pt nanoparticles supported on KL zeolite

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The catalytic properties of two noble metals, Pt and Ru, supported on KL zeolite were investigated in the selective transformation of bioethanol. In aiming to have an increased basicity of the catalyst, a KL zeolite modified by the addition of Ba was also used as support for Pt catalyst. For comparative purposes Ru supported on hydrophobic high surface area graphite (HSAG) was also prepared. The catalytic tests were conducted in a fixed bed flow reactor feeding ethanol in an inert gas, either pure ethanol vapor or a mixture of 10%water/90%ethanol, and working at low conversions to assure kinetic conditions. All the catalysts have relatively stable catalytic performances at less up to 6 hours on stream with both reactant feedings. In general the catalytic activities of Pt based catalysts, given as turn-over-frequencies, were one order of magnitude higher than those obtained over Ru catalysts. It was also demonstrated that the nature of the supported metal nanoparticles (Ru vs. Pt) significantly affects the product selectivities. So when comparing Pt/KL and Ru/KL, methane and carbon monoxide byproducts are mainly produced on the former, indicating that degradation of the primary product acetaldehyde by decarbonylation is higher on Pt catalysts. In the case of ruthenium nanoparticles, acetaldehyde is the predominant product. Finally by the comparison of Ru supported on KL zeolite and on HSAG revealed that, in the second case, ethylene is the principal byproduct and that in some extension this ethylene can be hydrogenated to ethane, provably spending hydrogen generated in the acetaldehyde formation. DRIFTS experiments were also conducted to identify the adsorbed intermediate species present under reaction conditions on the different catalysts. All the selectivity differences have been rationalized using appropriate reaction pathways, and it is inferred that the variation of the chosen metal-support system is decisive to obtain a given reaction product.