Published in

Taylor & Francis (Routledge), Australian Archaeology, 1(67), p. 79-86

DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2008.11681880

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Three styles of Darwinian evolution in the analysis of stone artefacts: Which one to use in mainland Southeast Asia?

Journal article published in 2008 by Ben Marwick ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Our understanding of fl aked stone artefacts from assemblages in mainland Southeast Asia is constrained by a shortage of robust and fl exible theory to generate suitable methods of analysis. I review three candidate theories derived from Darwinian evolutionary principles to identify the most suitable for investigating fl aked stone artefacts from mainland Southeast Asia. The demands of the theory are compared with the evidential constraints of the assemblages. Human behavioural ecology is found to be the most suitable because of the reliable methods available to test predictions with artefact assemblages. A small case study is discussed to demonstrate the applicability of this approach.