Published in

Royal Society of Chemistry, Dalton Transactions, 33(41), p. 9928

DOI: 10.1039/c2dt30503h

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Self assembled composites of luminescent Ru(II) metallopolymers and the Dawson polyoxometalate α-[Mo18O54(SO4)2]4-

Journal article published in 2012 by James J. Walsh ORCID, Jie Zhu, Qiang Zeng, Robert J. Forster, Tia E. Keyes ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The interaction of two luminescent metallopolymers; [Ru(bpy)(2)(PVP)(10)](2+) and [Ru(bpy)(2)(CAIP)co-poly(7)](+), where bpy is 2,2'-bipyridyl, PVP is polyvinylpyridine, and (CAIP)co-poly(7) is poly(styrene(6)-co-p-(aminomethyl)styrene) amide linked to 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f] [1,10]phenanthroline, with the Dawson polyoxomolybdate α-[Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)](4-) is described. Both metallopolymers undergo electrostatic association with the polyoxometalate. From both electronic and luminescence spectroscopy the thermodynamic products were determined to be {[Ru(bpy)(2)(PVP)(10)](4.5)[Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)]}(5+) and {[Ru(bpy)(2)(CAIP)co-poly(7)](5)[Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)]}(+), i.e. in both instances, the number of ruthenium centres in the cluster exceeds the number required for charge neutralization of the molybdate centre. Association quenches the luminescence of the metallopolymer although, consistent with the excess of Ru(ii) present in the associated composites, emission is not completely extinguished even when a large excess of [Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)](4-) is present. The observed emission lifetime was not affected by [Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)](4-) therefore quenching was deemed static. The luminescent intensity data was found to fit best to a (sphere of action) Perrin model from which the radii of the quenching were calculated as 4.6 Å and 5.8 Å for [Ru(bpy)(2)(PVP)(10)](2+) and [Ru(bpy)(2)(CAIP co-poly)(7)](+) respectively. Both UV/Vis and resonance Raman data indicate the presence of a new optical transition centered around 490 nm for the composite, {[Ru(bpy)(2)(PVP)(10)](4.5)[Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)]}(5+) but not for {[Ru(bpy)(2)(CAIP)co-poly(7)](5)[Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)]}(+). This indicates strong electronic interaction between the metal centres in the former composite, which despite good thermodynamic analogy, is not observed for {[Ru(bpy)(2)(CAIP)co-poly(7)](5)[Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)]}(+). These results are consistent with photoelectrochemical studies of layer by layer assemblies of these films which indicate that the ruthenium centre sensitizes polyoxometalate photo-oxidation of benzyl alcohol in {[Ru(bpy)(2)(PVP)(10)](4.5)[Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)]}(5+) but not in {[Ru(bpy)(2)(CAIP)co-poly(7)](5)[Mo(18)O(54)(SO(4))(2)]}(+).