Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Royal Society of Chemistry, CrystEngComm, 24(15), p. 4917

DOI: 10.1039/c3ce40102b

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Aryl-substituents moderate the nature of hydrogen bonds, N–HN versus N–HO, leading to supramolecular chains in the crystal structures of N-arylamino 1,2,3-triazole esters

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Structural analysis reveals the presence of supramolecular chains in a series of eight N-arylamino 1,2,3-triazole esters, which differ only in the nature of the substituent (Y) of the terminal aryl ring. In each of 1 (Y = 4-H), 3 (4-Cl), 4 (4-Br), 5 (4-I) and 6 (4-OMe), the chains are sustained by N–HN hydrogen bonding. In 2 (Y = 4-F) and 8 (Y = 2,5-Cl2), the chains are mediated by alternating N–HN and N–HO hydrogen bonding, whereas in 7 (Y = 4-NO2) the chain is sustained by N–HO hydrogen bonding only. While the differences in the adopted supramolecular motifs are qualitatively correlated with the electronegativity of the Y substituents, no quantitative correlations could be made with the electronic structures of the theoretical gas-phase molecules. Two distinct patterns of crystal packing are observed, with the first of these being based on the inter-digitation of layers, comprised of supramolecular chains and connections of the type C–Xπ(aryl) between them for 3–5 and 8; only weak off-set edge-to-edge ππ interactions were noted in the case of 1. A common feature of the zigzag chains in these crystal structures was a syn-disposition of successive aryl rings along the axis of propagation. The remaining structures adopted three-dimensional architectures where the Y substituents of the anti-disposed aryl rings participated in FH (2) or C–HO (6 and 7) interactions. A detailed analysis of the Hirshfeld surfaces and fingerprint plots for 1–8 enabled a comparison of the intermolecular interactions involved in constructing the disparate supramolecular architectures. In the structures featuring N–HN hydrogen bonding leading to the supramolecular chain, the maximum contribution to the overall crystal packing was less than 20%. This increased to over 25% in the case where there was exclusive N–HO hydrogen bonding in the chain.