Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Taylor & Francis (Routledge), Local Environment, 4(10), p. 361-377

DOI: 10.1080/13549830500160842

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Industrial pollution and social deprivation: Evidence and complexity in evaluating and responding to environmental inequality

Journal article published in 2005 by Gordon Walker, Gordon Mitchell ORCID, John Fairburn, Graham Smith
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The local impacts of industrial pollution can take many forms and—whilst uncertain in their scale, severity and distribution—are widely recognised. The question of who in society potentially experiences these impacts through living near to emission sources has been little explored, at least in the UK. This paper reports on a study carried out for the Environment Agency, which examined the distribution of sites coming within the Industrial Pollution Control (IPC) regime against patterns of deprivation. Our analysis provides evidence of a socially unequal distribution of IPC sites in England, with sites disproportionately located and clustered together in deprived areas and near to deprived populations. In discussing these results we emphasise the methodological limitations of this form of environmental justice analysis and the crucial differences between proximity, risk and impact. We also consider the distinction between inequality and injustice and the difficult policy questions which arise when evaluating evidence of environmental inequality, including potential grounds for policy intervention.