Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Springer (part of Springer Nature), Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7(8), p. 1393-1404

DOI: 10.1007/s11947-015-1501-4

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effects of Pasteurization on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Properties of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Water: Thermal vs. High-Pressure Carbon Dioxide Pasteurization

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Coconut water is a tropical beverage with a distinctive odor and flavor that has until now not been adequately characterized. In the present paper, the volatile compound composition of coconut water was investigated using head space solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Analyses were made of fresh untreated (FU) samples and samples pasteurized using two different technologies: conventional thermal treatment (thermal pasteurization (TP)) and high-pressure carbon dioxide (HPCD) pasteurization, which has recently attracted great interest as an innovative nonthermal preservation treatment. Seventy-three volatile compounds were identified; 27 of them reported for the first time in coconut water. The results showed that HPCD treatment depletes short- and medium-chain alcohols, while TP treatment triggers an increase in aldehydes, ketones, and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, an aroma compound active at low odor thresholds and characterized by “popcorn” and “toasted” odor descriptors. Sensory discrimination analysis (triangle test) showed there to be no significant differences between HPCD and FU samples, while TP and FU samples were perceived significantly differently. Descriptive sensory analyses evidenced more intense “cooked,” “toasted bread,” and “hazelnut” characteristics in TP-treated coconut water, consistent with HS-SPME-GC-MS data. In conclusion, instrumentally measurable changes in volatile compounds were more moderate with HPCD than with TP treatment and were not sensorially perceivable compared with the FU product.