Published in

Wiley, Journal of Separation Science, 20(32), p. 3529-3538, 2009

DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200900351

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Fish: Evaluation of a Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe Extraction Method

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

QuEChERS method was evaluated for extraction of 16 PAHs from fish samples. For a selective measurement of the compounds, extracts were analysed by LC with fluorescence detection. The overall analytical procedure was validated by systematic recovery experiments at three levels and by using the standard reference material SRM 2977 (mussel tissue). The targeted contaminants, except naphthalene and acenaphthene, were successfully extracted from SRM 2977 with recoveries ranging from 63.5-110.0% with variation coefficients not exceeding 8%. The optimum QuEChERS conditions were the following: 5 g of homogenised fish sample, 10 mL of ACN, agitation performed by vortex during 3 min. Quantification limits ranging from 0.12-1.90 ng/g wet weight (0.30-4.70 microg/L) were obtained. The optimized methodology was applied to assess the safety concerning PAHs contents of horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus), chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus), sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and farmed seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Although benzo(a)pyrene, the marker used for evaluating the carcinogenic risk of PAHs in food, was not detected in the analysed samples (89 individuals corresponding to 27 homogenized samples), the overall mean concentration ranged from 2.52 +/- 1.20 ng/g in horse mackerel to 14.6 +/- 2.8 ng/g in farmed seabass. Significant differences were found between the mean PAHs concentrations of the four groups.