Published in

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 01(20), p. 85-92

DOI: 10.1017/s0963180110000642

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Does Informed Consent Have an Expiry Date? A Critical Reappraisal of Informed Consent as a Process

Journal article published in 2011 by Gert Helgesson ORCID, Stefan Eriksson
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Informed consent is central to modern research ethics. Informed consent procedures have mainly been justified in terms of respect for autonomy, the core idea being that it should be every competent individual's right to decide for herself whether or not to participate in scientific studies. A number of conditions are normally raised with regard to morally valid informed consent. These include that potential research subjects get adequate information, understand those aspects that are relevant to them, and, based on that information, make a voluntary decision whether or not to participate. These conditions are meant to guarantee that participation is genuinely the individual's own choice and is coherent with his or her authentic interests.