Published in

Cambridge University Press, British Journal of Nutrition, 5(128), p. 940-947, 2021

DOI: 10.1017/s0007114521004049

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Interaction effects of socio-economic position in the association between eating location and diet quality in Portuguese children and adolescents: results from the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2015–2016

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to evaluate the interaction effect of socio-economic environment (SEE) in the relationship between the eating location (EL) and diet quality, in children and adolescents. Data included Portuguese children and adolescents (3–17 years) from a National Dietary Survey Sample (IAN-AF 2015/2016, n 987). Dietary intake was obtained by 2-d food diaries (children) or 2–24-h-recall (adolescents). Participants were classified into four groups of EL: ‘Home’, ‘Other homes’, ‘School’ and ‘Restaurants’. Diet quality was measured as a higher adherence to a healthy eating pattern. A previous developed socio-economic classification was used, and participants were grouped as belonging to a low socio-economic environment (LSE) or middle-high socio-economic environment (MHSE). Linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between EL and diet quality, stratified by the SEE. A statistically significant interaction effect was found (P < 0·01) for the SEE in the association between EL and diet quality. After adjustment for potential confounders, in LSE, participants belonging to ‘Other homes’ (β = –2·07; 95 % CI:–3·70, –0·44) and ‘Restaurants’ (β = –3·31; 95 % CI: –5·08, –1·54) had lower scores in the diet quality score, comparing to ‘Home’. In MHSE, comparing with ‘Home’, ‘Restaurants’ showed lower diet quality (β = –1·56; 95 % CI:–2·65, –0·48), while the ‘School’ had better diet quality (β = 0·90; 95 % CI: 0·16, 1·64). The SEE influences the association between EL and diet quality and, belonging to more disadvantaged SEE, might represent a higher risk of unhealthy eating habits when eating out-of-home.