Royal Society of Chemistry, Energy & Environmental Science, 9(13), p. 2979-2992, 2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0ee01530j
Full text: Unavailable
This paper reviews methodological approaches for determining the carbon footprint of captured CO2 as carbon feedstock, and shows why some approaches lead to suboptimal choices of CO2 sources and that increased consistency in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies on CCU is needed.