Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Academy of Management, Academy of Management Proceedings, 1(2016), p. 13841, 2016

DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2016.13841abstract

Cambridge University Press, Behavioural Public Policy, 3(5), p. 333-353, 2019

DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2019.4

SSRN Electronic Journal

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3051673

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Invisible Inequality Leads to Punishing the Poor and Rewarding the Rich

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractFour experiments examine how lack of awareness of inequality affect behaviour towards the rich and poor. In Experiment 1, participants who became aware that wealthy individuals donated a smaller percentage of their income switched from rewarding the wealthy to rewarding the poor. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants who played a public goods game – and were assigned incomes reflective of the US income distribution either at random or on merit – punished the poor (for small absolute contributions) and rewarded the rich (for large absolute contributions) when incomes were unknown; when incomes were revealed, participants punished the rich (for their low percentage of income contributed) and rewarded the poor (for their high percentage of income contributed). In Experiment 4, participants provided with public education contributions for five New York school districts levied additional taxes on mostly poorer school districts when incomes were unknown, but targeted wealthier districts when incomes were revealed. These results shed light on how income transparency shapes preferences for equity and redistribution. We discuss implications for policy-makers.