Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Heart Association, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 10(10), p. e004998

DOI: 10.1161/circep.116.004998

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Influence of Intramyocardial Adipose Tissue on the Accuracy of Endocardial Contact Mapping of the Chronic Myocardial Infarction Substrate

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that intramyocardial adipose tissue (IMAT) may contribute to ventricular electrophysiological remodeling in patients with chronic myocardial infarction. Using an ovine model of myocardial infarction, we aimed to determine the influence of IMAT on scar tissue identification during endocardial contact mapping and optimal voltage-based mapping criteria for defining IMAT dense regions. Method and Results: In 7 sheep, left ventricular endocardial and transmural mapping was performed 84 weeks (15–111 weeks) post-myocardial infarction. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between endocardial contact electrogram amplitude and histological composition of myocardium. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to derive optimal electrogram thresholds for IMAT delineation during endocardial mapping and to describe the use of endocardial mapping for delineation of IMAT dense regions within scar. Endocardial electrogram amplitude correlated significantly with IMAT (unipolar r =−0.48±0.12, P <0.001; bipolar r =−0.45±0.22, P =0.04) but not collagen (unipolar r =−0.36±0.24, P =0.13; bipolar r =−0.43±0.31, P =0.16). IMAT dense regions of myocardium reliably identified using endocardial mapping with thresholds of <3.7 and <0.6 mV, respectively, for unipolar, bipolar, and combined modalities (single modality area under the curve=0.80, P <0.001; combined modality area under the curve=0.84, P <0.001). Unipolar mapping using optimal thresholding remained significantly reliable (area under the curve=0.76, P <0.001) during mapping of IMAT, confined to putative scar border zones (bipolar amplitude, 0.5–1.5 mV). Conclusions: These novel findings enhance our understanding of the confounding influence of IMAT on endocardial scar mapping. Combined bipolar and unipolar voltage mapping using optimal thresholds may be useful for delineating IMAT dense regions of myocardium, in postinfarct cardiomyopathy.