Published in

Wiley, British Journal of Haematology, 2(149), p. 237-243, 2010

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08081.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Final analysis of the UKLG LY02 trial comparing 6-8 cycles of CHOP with 3 cycles of CHOP followed by a BEAM autograft in patients <65 years with poor prognosis histologically aggressive NHL

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

P>This trial involved 457 patients and sought to assess the value of early intensification with autologous transplantation in patients with poor prognosis histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) showing a response to initial CHOP (cyclosphosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) chemotherapy. Randomization was made at the time of diagnosis with 223 assigned to continuing CHOP and 234 to 3 cycles of CHOP followed by a BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) autograft. Analysis was on an intention to treat basis. After the initial three cycles of CHOP 19% of the whole group were in complete response (CR) and 53% in partial remission (PR). At the end of treatment 86% of patients in the CHOP arm had responded with 58% in CR. In the high-dose therapy arm the overall response rate was 83% with 64% in CR (difference between arms not significant). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival at 5 years for the continuing CHOP arm were 38% and 50% respectively, and for the autograft arm were 44% and 50% (differences not significant). Of the patients who attained CR and subsequently relapsed, there were no long-term survivors in the autograft recipients compared to 46% of the continuing CHOP recipients (P = 0 center dot 0008). In conclusion, no survival benefit was demonstrated for an early autograft in first response.