<b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of our study was to assess charts proposed for international use in the Intergrowth-21st Project. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Ultrasound data were collected from 43,923 healthy singleton pregnancies examined at 18–23 weeks of gestation in the Netherlands. Fetal measurements were converted into <i>Z</i>-scores using previous and current Dutch reference charts and Intergrowth charts. The distributions of the <i>Z</i>-scores were compared with the expected standard normal distribution. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the Dutch population, Intergrowth curves perform well for head circumference and biparietal diameter, but not for abdominal circumference (AC, <i>Z</i>- score = 0.43) and femur length (FL, <i>Z</i>-score = 0.26). Similar findings have been reported in other European countries. Compared with the population in the Intergrowth study, Dutch women are relatively tall (170 vs. 162 cm) and sturdy (67 vs. 61 kg) with a moderately high BMI. Maternal size, in particular maternal height, is positively correlated with birthweight. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Whilst the establishment of the Intergrowth charts is an important step towards worldwide uniformity, for now locally derived charts still perform better, especially for AC and FL. Results from our validation study indicate that distinction between normal and pathologically small babies may be improved by taking maternal size into account.