Published in

Karger Publishers, Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 1(154), p. 37-44, 2018

DOI: 10.1159/000487063

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A Comparative Chromosome Mapping Study in Japanese Podismini Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Melanoplinae)

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In the present paper, karyotypes of 7 Japanese Podismini species, <i>Anapodisma beybienkoi, Fruhstorferiola okinawaensis, Parapodisma caelestis, P. mikado, P. setouchiensis, P. tenryuensis, </i>and<i> Sinopodisma punctata</i> (2n&#x2642; = 21, all acrocentric), are described and compared on the basis of conventional (C-banding, DAPI/CMA<sub>3</sub>-staining, Ag-NOR) and molecular (FISH with 18S rDNA and telomeric probes) cytogenetic staining methods. This is the first study to report karyotypes of <i>A. beybienkoi </i>and <i>P. caelestis</i>. Differential staining techniques showed karyotypic diversity in these species. The number of 18S rDNA signals ranged from 2 to 6, and the signals were located on the autosomes or sex chromosomes. In all species, clusters of rDNA coincided with Ag-NORs. Telomeric signals occurred at the chromosome ends at the pachytene stage and seldom at other stages of meiosis. Paracentromeric and some distal and interstitial blocks of constitutive heterochromatin were detected in the chromosomes of <i>Anapodisma, Fruhstorferiola, </i>and <i>Parapodisma </i>species. Staining with DAPI and CMA<sub>3</sub> revealed 2 groups of heterochromatin composition. In addition, intraspecific differences in the number of rDNA clusters and C-bands were observed within <i>Parapodisma </i>species. Based on the evidence of cytogenetic characteristics, the monophyly of Tonkinacridina cannot be supported.