BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ Open, 2(8), p. e018444, 2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018444
Full text: Download
ObjectiveTo examine symptom severity and duration at time of referral to secondary care for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) by socioeconomic deprivation, age and ethnicityDesignCohort analysis of data from the National HMB Audit linked to Hospital Episode Statistics data.SettingEnglish and Welsh National Health Services (secondary care): February 2011 to January 2012.Participants15 325 women aged 18–60 years in England and Wales who had a new referral for HMB to a gynaecology outpatient departmentMethodsMultivariable linear regression to calculate adjusted differences in mean symptom severity and quality of life scores at first outpatient visit. Multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted ORs. Adjustment for body mass index, parity and comorbidities.Primary outcome measuresMean symptom severity score (0=best, 100=worst), mean condition-specific quality of life score (0=worst, 100=best) and symptom duration (≥1 year).ResultsWomen were on average 42 years old and 12% reported minority ethnic backgrounds. Mean symptom severity and condition-specific quality of life scores were 61.8 and 34.7. Almost three-quarters of women (74%) reported having had symptoms for ≥1 year. Women from more deprived areas had more severe symptoms at their first outpatient visit (difference −6.1; 95% CI−7.2 to −4.9, between least and most deprived quintiles) and worse condition-specific quality of life (difference 6.3; 95% CI 5.1 to 7.5). Symptom severity declined with age while quality of life improved.ConclusionsWomen living in more deprived areas reported more severe HMB symptoms and poorer quality of life at the start of treatment in secondary care. Providers should examine referral practices to explore if these differences reflect women’s health-seeking behaviour or how providers decide whether or not to refer.