Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Public Library of Science, PLoS ONE, 8(12), p. e0183970, 2017

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183970

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Positively selected amino acid replacements within the RuBisCO enzyme of oak trees are associated with ecological adaptations

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML) has become the standard approach to study positive selection at the molecular level, but other methods may provide complementary ways to identify amino acid replacements associated with particular conditions. Here, we compare results of the decision tree (DT) model method with ones of PAML using the key photosynthetic enzyme RuBisCO as a model system to study molecular adaptation to particular ecological conditions in oaks (Quercus). We sequenced the chloroplast rbcL gene encoding RuBisCO large subunit in 158 Quercus species, covering about a third of the global genus diversity. It has been hypothesized that RuBisCO has evolved differentially depending on the environmental conditions and leaf traits governing internal gas diffusion patterns. Here, we show, using PAML, that amino acid replacements at the residue positions 95, 145, 251, 262 and 328 of the RuBisCO large subunit have been the subject of positive selection along particular Quercus lineages associated with the leaf traits and climate characteristics. In parallel, the DT model identified amino acid replacements at sites 95, 219, 262 and 328 being associated with the leaf traits and climate characteristics, exhibiting partial overlap with the results obtained using PAML. ; The study was financially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (projects AGL2009-07999 and AGL2013-42364- R). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. ; Published