Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Nature Research, Nature Communications, 1(9), 2018

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06649-5

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Novel pleiotropic risk loci for melanoma and nevus density implicate multiple biological pathways.

Journal article published in 2018 by Dl L. Duffy, Nienke van der Stoep, Remco van Doorn ORCID, Lc C. Jacobs, Dm M. Evans, Duffy Dl, Matthew A. Brown, Jc C. Taylor, Mj J. Wright, Gu Zhu, Ak K. Henders, Lisa Bowdler, Xin Li, Dan Glass, Am M. Ikram and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThe total number of acquired melanocytic nevi on the skin is strongly correlated with melanoma risk. Here we report a meta-analysis of 11 nevus GWAS from Australia, Netherlands, UK, and USA comprising 52,506 individuals. We confirm known loci including MTAP, PLA2G6, and IRF4, and detect novel SNPs in KITLG and a region of 9q32. In a bivariate analysis combining the nevus results with a recent melanoma GWAS meta-analysis (12,874 cases, 23,203 controls), SNPs near GPRC5A, CYP1B1, PPARGC1B, HDAC4, FAM208B, DOCK8, and SYNE2 reached global significance, and other loci, including MIR146A and OBFC1, reached a suggestive level. Overall, we conclude that most nevus genes affect melanoma risk (KITLG an exception), while many melanoma risk loci do not alter nevus count. For example, variants in TERC and OBFC1 affect both traits, but other telomere length maintenance genes seem to affect melanoma risk only. Our findings implicate multiple pathways in nevogenesis.