Published in

Royal College of Surgeons of England, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1(102), p. 3-8, 2020

DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0157

Elsevier, International Journal of Surgery, (36), p. S84, 2016

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.274

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Supportive technology in collaborative research: Proposing the STiCR framework

Journal article published in 2016 by Rm Kwasnicki, Ld Cato ORCID, L. Geoghegan, G. Stanley, J. Pancholi, A. Jain, Md Gardiner
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Introduction Achieving a standard of clinical research at the pinnacle of the evidence pyramid is historically expensive and logistically challenging. Research collaboratives have delivered high-impact prospective multicentre audits and clinical trials by using trainee networks with a range of enabling technology. This review outlines such use of technology in the UK and provides a framework of recommended technologies for future studies. Methods A review of the literature identified technology used in collaborative projects. Additional technologies were identified through web searches. Technologies were grouped into themes including access (networking and engagement), collaboration and event organisation. The technologies available to support each theme were studied further to outline relative benefits and limitations. Findings Thirty-three articles from trainee research collaboratives were identified. The most frequently documented technologies were social media applications, website platforms and research databases. The Supportive Technologies in Collaborative Research framework is proposed, providing a structure for using the technologies available to support multicentre collaboration. Such technologies are often overlooked in the literature by established and start-up collaborative project groups. If used correctly, they might help to overcome the physical, logistical and financial barriers of multicentre clinical trials.