Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Karger Publishers, Obesity Facts, 5(10), p. 493-502, 2017

DOI: 10.1159/000480404

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The Socioeconomic Burden of Obesity

Journal article published in 2017 by Jakob Kjellberg ORCID, Arendse Tange Larsen ORCID, Rikke Ibsen, Betina Højgaard
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Objective: </i></b>To evaluate the socioeconomic impact of obesity by estimating the direct and indirect costs associated with obesity in Denmark, based on individual level data. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Costs were assessed for different BMI groups, and the relative risks for change in direct and indirect costs per BMI point above 30 were estimated. A fourth analysis estimated the odds ratio for comorbidities per BMI point above 30. Individual data on income, social transfer payments, healthcare costs and diagnoses were retrieved from national registries. <b><i>Results: </i></b>One BMI point above 30 was associated with a 2% decrease in income, a 3% increase in social transfer payments, and a 4% increase in healthcare costs. In absolute numbers, income contributed to most of the total economic burden. One BMI point above 30 was also associated with increased comorbidity, which explains the increase in both direct and indirect costs. <b><i>Conclusion: </i></b>Obesity is associated with increased comorbidity, giving rise to an increase in both direct and indirect costs. Especially income is affected, which emphasizes the importance of including both measures when evaluating the total socioeconomic burden of obesity. Our findings draw attention to the potential for saving public resources and preventing loss of income by preventing obesity.