Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

International Union of Crystallography, Acta Crystallographica. Section d, Structural Biology, 4(73), p. 316-325, 2017

DOI: 10.1107/s2059798317000584

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Data mining of iron(II) and iron(III) bond-valence parameters, and their relevance for macromolecular crystallography

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The bond-valence model is a reliable way to validate assumed oxidation states based on structural data. It has successfully been employed for analyzing metal-binding sites in macromolecule structures. However, inconsistent results for heme-based structures suggest that some widely used bond-valenceR0parameters may need to be adjusted in certain cases. Given the large number of experimental crystal structures gathered since these initial parameters were determined and the similarity of binding sites in organic compounds and macromolecules, the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) is a valuable resource for refining metal–organic bond-valence parameters.R0bond-valence parameters for iron(II), iron(III) and other metals have been optimized based on an automated processing of all CSD crystal structures. Almost allR0bond-valence parameters were reproduced, except for iron–nitrogen bonds, for which distinctR0parameters were defined for two observed subpopulations, corresponding to low-spin and high-spin states, of iron in both oxidation states. The significance of this data-driven method for parameter discovery, and how the spin state affects the interpretation of heme-containing proteins and iron-binding sites in macromolecular structures, are discussed.