Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ Open, 2(7), p. e013537, 2017

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies

Journal article published in 2017 by E. O. C. Francischetto, Kerry N. L. Avery ORCID, N. Blencowe, C. Bugge, M. Campbell ORCID, Paula R. Williamson, M. Collinson, C. Cooper, J. Darbyshire, Carrol Gamble, M. Dimairo ORCID, C. Doré, S. Eldridge, Elaine O'Connell Francischetto, A. Farrin ORCID and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Upload
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Objectives: Designing studies with an internal pilot phase may optimise the use of pilot work to inform more efficient randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Careful selection of preagreed decision or 'progression' criteria at the juncture between the internal pilot and main trial phases provides a valuable opportunity to evaluate the likely success of the main trial and optimise its design or, if necessary, to make the decision not to proceed with the main trial. Guidance on the appropriate selection and application of progression criteria is, however, lacking. This paper outlines the key issues to consider in the optimal development and review of operational progression criteria for RCTs with an internal pilot phase. Design: A structured literature review and exploration of stakeholders' opinions at a Medical Research Council (MRC) Hubs for Trials Methodology Research workshop. Key stakeholders included triallists, methodologists, statisticians and funders. Results: There is considerable variation in the use of progression criteria for RCTs with an internal pilot phase, although 3 common issues predominate: trial recruitment, protocol adherence and outcome data. Detailed and systematic reporting around the decisionmaking process for stopping, amending or proceeding to a main trial is uncommon, which may hamper understanding in the research community about the appropriate and optimal use of RCTs with an internal pilot phase. 10 top tips for the development, use and reporting of progression criteria for internal pilot studies are presented. Conclusions: Systematic and transparent reporting of the design, results and evaluation of internal pilot trials in the literature should be encouraged in order to facilitate understanding in the research community and to inform future trials.