Published in

Associação Brasileira de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Ciência and Saúde Coletiva, 1(16), p. 165-178, 2011

DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000100020

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Environmental Health Perspectives, 12(117), p. 1813-1831, 2009

DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0900793

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In this review, we focus on environmental cleanup and provide a background and overview of current practice; research findings; societal issues; potential environment, health, and safety implications; and future directions for nanoremediation. We also discuss nanoscale zero-valent iron in detail. We searched the Web of Science for research studies and accessed recent publicly available reports from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies and organizations that addressed the applications and implications associated with nanoremediation techniques. We also conducted personal interviews with practitioners about specific site remediations. We aggregated information from 45 sites, a representative portion of the total projects under way, to show nanomaterials used, types of pollutants addressed, and organizations responsible for each site. Nanoremediation has the potential not only to reduce the overall costs of cleaning up large-scale contaminated sites but also to reduce cleanup time, eliminate the need for treatment and disposal of contaminated soil, and reduce some contaminant concentrations to near zero - all in situ.