Published in

Elsevier, Fuel, (105), p. 630-635

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.10.007

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Assessing the performance of commercial and biological gas hydrate inhibitors using nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy and a stirred autoclave

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

h i g h l i g h t s " The results showed that MRI is an effective tool for the evaluation of the performance of KI. " This technique was especially valuable to evaluate limitedly available biological KI's. " MRI and gas uptake experiments showed the same trends in nucleation times. " Microscopic (MRI) and macroscopic (gas uptake) experiments were in good agreement for growth assessment. a b s t r a c t The formation kinetics of methane/ethane/propane hydrate in the presence of kinetic inhibitors was investigated using 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as a more-traditional method using a stirred autoclave. These studies were facilitated by fabricating a multi-drop insert for 1 H NMR micro-imaging, which allowed the comparison of the performance of microliter quantities of several inhibitors simultaneously and under the same conditions. Both methods showed that hydrate nucleation and growth were delayed significantly in the presence of inhibitors, which included two biological inhib-itors (antifreeze proteins) and a commercial inhibitor. The results demonstrate that MRI is a useful tool for the visualization and evaluation of the performance of kinetic inhibitors on mixed gas hydrate forma-tion. The MRI technique should prove especially valuable in the case of analysis of potential inhibitors, pre-commercialization, which are available in only limited quantities, such as biological inhibitors. This technique may also find utility in the exploration of differences in inhibitor performance, which may suggest distinct mechanisms of inhibitor action.