Published in

SAGE Publications, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 4(54), p. 448-452

DOI: 10.1177/154193121005400437

PsycEXTRA Dataset

DOI: 10.1037/e578652012-037

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

What makes Real-World Interruptions Disruptive? Evidence from an Office Setting

Journal article published in 2010 by David M. Cades, Nicole E. Werner, Deborah A. Boehm-Davis, Zara Arshad
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

With the constant barrage of cell phone calls, emails, instant messages, calendar reminders, and more, interruptions have become a common and consistent occurrence in our daily lives. The majority of the literature on interruptions to date has been based on controlled laboratory experiments and it is not yet completely clear how these results will translate into naturalistic settings and/or if there are certain features of interruptions and resumption that are not observable in the controlled setting. The current study is an exploratory study of how interruptions manifest in the naturalistic environment. We found that when working on computer-based tasks in real-world environments, external interruptions are more disruptive than internal interruptions. However, no reliable difference was shown in resumption time when resuming from multiple interruptions as opposed to single interruptions, and when resuming a different task as opposed to resuming the same task that was interrupted.