Published in

American Chemical Society, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 3(22), p. 418-430, 2011

DOI: 10.1007/s13361-010-0060-1

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Stable Isotope Labeling Strategy for Protein–Ligand Binding Analysis in Multi-Component Protein Mixtures

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Described here is a stable isotope labeling protocol that can be used with a chemical modification- and mass spectrometry-based protein–ligand binding assay for detecting and quantifying both the direct and indirect binding events that result from protein–ligand binding interactions. The protocol utilizes an H216O2 and H218O2 labeling strategy to evaluate the chemical denaturant dependence of methionine oxidation in proteins both in the presence and absence of a target ligand. The differential denaturant dependence to the oxidation reactions performed in the presence and absence of ligand provides a measure of the protein stability changes that occur as a result of direct interactions of proteins with the target ligand and/or as a result of indirect interactions involving other protein–ligand interactions that are either induced or disrupted by the ligand. The described protocol utilizes the 18O/16O ratio in the oxidized protein samples to quantify the ligand-induced protein stability changes. The ratio is determined using the isotopic distributions observed for the methionine-containing peptides used for protein identification in the LC-MS-based proteomics readout. The strategy is applied to a multi-component protein mixture in this proof-of-principle experiment, which was designed to evaluate the technique’s ability to detect and quantify the direct binding interaction between cyclosporin A and cyclophilin A and to detect the indirect binding interaction between cyclosporin A and calcineurin (i.e., the protein–protein interaction between cyclophilin A and calcineurin that is induced by cyclosporin A binding to cyclophilin A).