Published in

Royal College of General Practitioners, British Journal of General Practice, 549(58), p. 256-263, 2008

DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08x279760

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework

Journal article published in 2008 by Kashifa Mahmood-Yousuf, Daniel Munday, Nigel King ORCID, Jeremy 1958 Dale ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background High quality end-of-life care in the community is achieved with effective multidisciplinary teamwork, interprofessional communication between GPs and district nurses, and early referral of patients to district nurses. These aspects of palliative care are highlighted in the Gold Standards Framework, a programme recently established in UK primary care. Aim To investigate the extent to which the framework influences interprofessional relationships and communication, and to compare GPs' and nurses experiences. Design of study Qualitative interview case study. Setting Fifteen participating practices from three primary care trusts in England. Method Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were undertaken with GPs, district nurses, Macmillan nurses, and framework facilitators. Results Adoption of the framework often resulted in earlier referral of palliative care patients to district nurses. Multidisciplinary team meetings enabled communication for sharing knowledge, discussing management problems, and keeping colleagues informed; however, arranging and maintaining such meetings was often problematic. Nurses particularly valued formal meetings while GPs generally preferred informal ad hoc dialogue. GPs largely maintained control of the mode of multidisciplinary working. The best functioning teams used a mixture of formal and informal, meetings with a relatively non-hierarchical working style. Conclusion Implementing the framework enabled processes of communication associated with high quality palliative care in general practice, but there was marked variation in how this worked in individual teams. In general, hierarchical doctor-nurse relationships persisted.