Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Treatment response evaluation using 18F-PET PET compared to MRI in glioblastoma patients at first recurrence treated with a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine

This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

Ziel/Aim:We compared prospectively MRI response assessment with O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET response evaluation during BEV/LOM treatment according to the BELOB trial in glioblastoma patients at first recurrence (Taal et al., 2014).Methodik/Methods:Glioblastoma patients at first recurrence after standard treatment (Stupp et al., 2005) were treated accordingly to the BELOB trial. Dynamic FET PET and MRI scans were performed at baseline and after 8-10 weeks. FET PET metabolic tumor volumes (MTV), maximum and mean tumor/brain ratios (TBRmax/mean) as well as dynamic FET PET parameters were obtained. The predictive ability of FET PET parameters and MRI on response assessment was evaluated with regard to PFS and OS after starting of treatment. Using ROC analyses, threshold values for FET PET parameter changes were obtained. MRI response assessment was based on RANO criteria (Wen et al., 2010). Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to assess the predictive power for survival.Ergebnisse/Results:Twenty-three patients were included. Fifteen of 23 patients (age range, 34-75 ys.; MGMT promoter not methylated, 87%; IDH wild type, 100%) were eligible for data evaluation. Treatment response as assessed by MRI was not predictive for a significant longer PFS (P=0.23) and OS (P=0.07), respectively. In contrast, FET PET changes predicted a longer PFS (MTV decrease>25%, P=0.01; TBRmax decrease>12%, P=0.02) and OS (MTV decrease>10%, P=0.04), respectively. Interestingly, the absolute MTV at the first follow-up scan (threshold, 9 ml) provides the most significant prediction for PFS (P=0.006) as well as OS (P=0.003). However, both TBRmean and dynamic FET PET parameters were not predictive for treatment response.Schlussfolgerungen/Conclusions:FET PET appears to be helpful to identify responders to BEV/LOM early after initiation of treatment.