Published in

Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board, Annales Zoologici Fennici, 5-6(52), p. 368-376, 2015

DOI: 10.5735/086.052.0501

Taylor and Francis Group, Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 12(24), p. 1311-1321, 2014

DOI: 10.1517/13543776.2014.968127

BioMed Central, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 1(9), 2016

DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0462-9

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Ionization and scintillation response of high-pressure xenon gas to alpha particles

Journal article published in 2013 by V. Álvarez, F. A. Pereira dos Santos, Myriam Zarazaga, R. de Nalda, Thorsten Wiegand, A. Vicente, Fernando Valladares, Carmen Torres ORCID, G. J. Tatlock, A. C. Soria, Ana Luisa Velasco Ávila, Kyriakos C. Stylianou, E. Urones-Garrote, Daniel Yero, J. Muñoz Vidal ORCID and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Upload
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Trabajo presentado a la XV Reunión Científica de la Sociedad Española de Cromatografía y Técnicas Afines (SECyTA) celebrada en Castellón de la Plana del 28 al 30 de octubre de 2015 ; Optimization of a separation in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) requires the selection of an appropriate set column, and the optimisation of their respective dimensions, temperature programs and flow rates. Until not so long ago, a time consuming trial and error process was the only way to select the columns and chromatographic conditions for the two GC dimensions. During the last few years, several attempts have been proposed to estimate the chromatographic response in GC×GC [1-4]. Although most of these methods are helpful contributions, some of them focussed exclusively on the retention time estimation and do not consider the effect of peak width, also essential for a correct prediction of the chromatographic separation capability. Others are based on theoretical formulas not applicable to the extreme experimental conditions used in GC×GC, or are only valid for specific types of compounds or stationary phases: these models cannot be corrected for different separation problems. In this work, modelization of retention time and peak width has been carried out from experimental 1D GC data in order to estimate the response in GC×GC separation for different column sets operated under different flows and temperatures. Several theoretical and experimental models are proposed for estimation of 1D and 2D retention time and peak width; in experimental models, 1D GC data are required together with information on column characteristics and operation conditions. Models for hold-up time, retention factor and peak width were first validated in 1D GC from the fit between experimental and calculated data. Their validation in GC×GC was carried out by using n-alkanes and a mixture of disaccharides as their trimethylsilyl oxime derivatives. Comparison of experimental and estimated data showed good results for retention time in both first and second dimension. Peak widths presented, however, some errors, caused by the no consideration on estimation of the effect of the modulator or the rather unusual chromatographic conditions used. The developed programme is very versatile as it can be used for the calculation of the chromatographic response of compounds with different polarity and volatility, analysed under different pressures and temperature ramps, and with different sets of columns. [1] J.V. Seeley, E.M. Libby, K.A.H. Edwards, S.K. Seeley, J. Chromatogr. A 1216 (2009) 1650. [2] F.L. Dorman, P.D. Schettler, L.A. Vogt, J.W. Cochran, J. Chromatogr. A 1186 (2008) 196. [3] Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, B. Wang, S.H. Kim, A. Fang, B. Bogdanov, Z. Zhou, C. McClain, X. Zhang, J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011) 2577. [4] S. Zhu, S. He, D.R. Worton, A.H. Goldstein, J. Chromatogr. A 1233 (2012) 147. Acknowledgements: This work has been funded by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (project CTQ2012-32957), Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) and European funding from FEDER program (AVANSECAL-CM S2013/ABI-3028) and Fundación Ramón Areces. ACS thanks Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain for a Ramón y Cajal contract. ; CTQ2012-32957 ; S2013/ABI-3028/AVANSECAL ; Peer reviewed