Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Building and Environment, (111), p. 123-131

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.10.020

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Thermal comfort in buildings using radiant vs. all-air systems: A critical literature review

Journal article published in 2016 by Caroline Karmann ORCID, Stefano Schiavon ORCID, Fred Bauman
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Hydronic radiant heating and cooling systems are considered as an energy efficient technology to condition buildings. We performed a literature review to assess if radiant systems provide better, equal or lower thermal comfort than all-air systems. We included only peer-reviewed articles and articles published in proceedings of scientific conferences. The publications found have been classified based on research methods used. These include: (1) building performance simulation (BPS), (2) physical measurements (in laboratory test chambers and in buildings) and (3) human subject testing / occupant based surveys. This review identified eight conclusive studies: five studies that could not establish a thermal comfort preference between all-air and radiant systems and three studies showing a preference for radiant systems. Very few studies were based on occupant feedback in real buildings suggesting a significant research need. Overall, we found that a limited number of studies are available and therefore a solid answer cannot be given. Nevertheless, there is suggestive evidence that radiant systems may provide equal or better comfort than all-air systems.