Published in

Elsevier, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, (47), p. 31-41

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.02.005

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Large eddy simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes calculations of supersonic impinging jets at varying nozzle-to-wall distances and impinging angles

Journal article published in 2014 by Linda Chan, Cheng Chin ORCID, Julio Soria, Andrew Ooi
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This paper utilises two different computational methods to investigate the characteristics of a supersonic impinging jet at non-dimensionalised nozzle-to-wall distances (Zn/DZn/D) of 1.5 and 2.5 with the impinging angles from 0° to 45°. The static Smagorinsky subgrid-scale model was chosen for the LES and the two equation k–∊k–∊ turbulence model for the RANS. Computational parameters applied in the simulations emulated the experimental setup conducted by Risborg (2008). From the results obtained, both methodologies were able to predict the location of the first shock cell fairly accurately when compared to the steady-state shadowgraph images of Risborg (2008). However, the intensities of the shocks were significantly different between the two numerical methods, with the RANS underestimating the value of the density gradients at the shocks. The pressure distribution near the impinging plate have been investigated and found to differ between the RANS and the LES for small impinging angles (0° and 10°) when Zn/D=1.5Zn/D=1.5. In addition, the RANS data was not able to capture the recirculation zone for Zn/D=1.5Zn/D=1.5 and 0°0°. The instantaneous velocity fluctuations and temperature contours of the LES were also plotted to visualise the shear layer instability and also the chaotic nature of the supersonic jet. For Zn/D=2.5Zn/D=2.5 and 0°0°, the jet experiences high velocity fluctuations as the configuration causes the axially flapping instability. Overall, there are discrepancies between the RANS and LES but both are able to capture the key averaged flow features of the supersonic impinging jets.