Published in

Elsevier, NeuroImage, 1(48), p. 14-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.050

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Lost in localization – but found with foci?!

Journal article published in 2009 by David C. Van Essen ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Commentaries by Derrfuss and Mar [Derrfuss, J., Mar, R.A., 2009. Lost in localization: the need for a universal coordinate database. Neuroimage (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.053).], Nielsen [Nielsen, F.A., 2009. Lost in localization: a solution with neuroinformatics 2.0? Neuroimage.], Hamilton [Hamilton, A., 2009. Lost in localization: a minimal middle way. Neuroimage.], and Laird and Fox [Laird, A.R., Fox, P.T., 2009 Lost in localization? The focus is meta-analysis. Neuroimage.] agree on the need for a comprehensive database of published stereotaxic coordinates but offer diverse views on how best to achieve this objective. Here, I summarize recent enhancements to the SumsDB database that increase its utility and decrease the impediments to data submission, thereby making it attractive as a resource that can approach comprehensive content in a realistic time frame.