Published in

Medknow Publications, Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(4), p. 483, 2015

DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.174332

Medknow Publications, Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 1(32), p. 1, 2016

DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.175616

Medknow Publications, Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research, 1(5), p. 2, 2016

DOI: 10.15380/2277-5706.jcsr.15.084

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The Revised Guidelines of the Medical Council of India for Academic Promotions: Need for a Rethink

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Measuring academic achievements is never an easy task. This is particularly so when individuals are assessed for promotions in several fields with differing job descriptions. Assessment by peers is time-consuming and may be prone to bias; thus, objective criteria are required to minimise these concerns.