Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SAGE Publications, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3(10), p. 231-237, 2001

DOI: 10.1177/096228020101000305

SAGE Publications, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3(10), p. 231-237

DOI: 10.1191/096228001680195175

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The application of methods to quantify attributable risk in medical practice

Journal article published in 2001 by W. Uter ORCID, A. Pfahlberg
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Several epidemiological parameters have been introduced for quantifying the population impact of a certain exposure on morbidity on a population level, termed ‘attributable risk’ (AR). Of these definitions, the AR as suggested by Levin in 1953 or some algebraic transformations of it are most commonly used. A structured literature search, based on the Medline database, identified 334 original epidemiological studies dealing with this AR published between 1966 and 1996 (mostly case-control studies). A considerable increase in the number of published studies incorporating some quantification of the exposure impact on the population level in terms of the AR was observed in the last decade. However, in 64.5% of these studies no exact definition of the AR used was given. Adjustment procedures necessary in multifactorial situations were performed by only 37.5%, confidence intervals for the AR were given by only 19.3% of authors. Thus, although the increasing popularity of this important epidemiological measure is encouraging, its correct application and comprehensive reporting in medical practice should be promoted further.