Published in

SAGE Publications, The Journal of Vascular Access, 1_suppl(17), p. S16-S22, 2016

DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000525

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The pros and cons of preserving a functioning arteriovenous fistula after kidney transplantation

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis burdens the cardiovascular system with increased cardiac output and pulmonary artery pressure, increasing cardiovascular risk. This article reviews literature on the benefits and drawbacks of a functioning AVF after kidney transplantation and discusses the cardiovascular effects of AVF closure. Several cohort studies demonstrate a significant cardiac burden of an AVF and improvement of cardiac dimensions after AVF ligation. However, no randomized trials have been conducted on routine AVF closure after successful kidney transplantation. Therefore, clinical trials are warranted to evaluate whether the cardiovascular benefits of routine AVF closure outweigh the potential harm for patients after successful kidney transplantation.