Published in

Elsevier, American Journal of Cardiology, 9(108), p. 1341-1345, 2011

DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.057

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Reference Limits for N-terminal-pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide in Healthy Individuals (From the Framingham Heart Study)

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) is a commonly measured cardiovascular biomarker in ambulatory and hospital settings. Nonetheless, there are limited data regarding "normal" ranges for NT-pro-BNP in healthy subjects, despite the importance of such information for interpreting natriuretic peptide measurements. In this study, a healthy reference sample free of cardiovascular disease from the Framingham Heart Study Generation 3 cohort was examined; there were 2,285 subjects (mean age 38 years, 56% women). Plasma NT-pro-BNP levels were measured using the Roche Diagnostics Elecsys 2010 assay, and reference values (2.5th, 50th, and 97.5th quantiles) were determined using empiric and quantile regression methods. Gender, age, blood pressure, and body mass index accounted for approximately 33% of the interindividual variability in NT-pro-BNP in the reference sample. NT-pro-BNP values were substantially higher in women compared to men at every age, and levels increased with increasing age for both genders. Using quantile regression, the upper reference values (97.5th quantile) for NT-pro-BNP were 42.5 to 106.4 pg/ml in men (depending on age) and 111.0 to 215.9 pg/ml in women. Intraindividual variability was assessed in an additional 12 healthy subjects, who had serial NT-pro-BNP measurements over 1 month. Intraclass correlation was 0.85, indicating that most of the variability in NT-pro-BNP concentrations was among rather than within subjects. However, the reference change value was 100%, suggesting that small proportional differences in NT-pro-BNP could be attributable to analytic variability. In conclusion, the reference limits obtained from this large, healthy, community-based sample may aid in the evaluation of NT-pro-BNP concentrations measured for clinical and research purposes.