Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Chemical Society, Organometallics, 18(31), p. 6514-6517, 2012

DOI: 10.1021/om300719t

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effect of Ligand Bulk in Ruthenium-Catalyzed Olefin Metathesis: IPr* vs IPr

This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Novel ruthenium catalysts, [RuCl2(IPr*)(PPh3)(3-phenylindenylidene)] (1) and [RuCl2(IPr*)(Py)(3-phenylindenylidene)] (2), bearing the very bulky ligand IPr* are reported. The complexes were tested in ring closing and cross-metathesis, and their activities were compared to that displayed by [RuCl2(IPr)(PPh3)(3-phenylindenylidene)] (3) and the new [RuCl2(IPr)(Py)(3-phenylindenylidene)] (4), in order to assess how the steric hindrance of the N-heterocyclic carbene influences the catalytic activity of the resulting ruthenium complexes.