Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, Genetics, 1(195), p. 243-251, 2013

DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.154963

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Correlation Between Mutation Rate and Genome Size in Riboviruses: Mutation Rate of Bacteriophage Qβ

Journal article published in 2013 by Katie Bradwell ORCID, Marine Combe, Pilar Domingo-Calap, Rafael Sanjuán
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Genome sizes and mutation rates co-vary across all domains of life. In unicellular organisms and DNA viruses, they show an inverse relationship known as Drake's rule. However, it is still unclear whether there exists a similar relationship between genome sizes and mutation rates in RNA genomes. Coronaviruses, the RNA viruses with the largest genomes (ca. 30 kb), encode a proofreading 3' exonuclease which allows them to increase replication fidelity. However it is unknown whether, conversely, the RNA viruses with the smallest genomes tend to show particularly high mutation rates. To test this, we measured the mutation rate of bacteriophage Qβ, a 4.2 kb levivirus. Amber reversion-based Luria-Delbrück fluctuation tests combined with mutant sequencing gave an estimate of 1.4 x 10(-4) substitutions per nucleotide per round of copying (s/n/r), the highest mutation rate reported for any virus using this method. This estimate was confirmed using a direct plaque sequencing approach and after reanalysis of previously published estimates for this phage. Comparison with other riboviruses (all RNA viruses except retroviruses) provided statistical support for a negative correlation between mutation rates and genome sizes. We suggest that the mutation rates of RNA viruses might be optimized for maximal adaptability, and that the value of this optimum may in turn depend inversely on genome size.