Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

BioMed Central, BMC Genetics, 1(14), 2013

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-21

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Proechimys (Rodentia, Echimyidae): characterization and taxonomic considerations of a form with a very low diploid number and a multiple sex chromosome system

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundProechimysis the most diverse genus in family Echimyidae, comprising 25 species (two of which are polytypic) and 39 taxa. Despite the numerous forms of this rodent and their abundance in nature, there are many taxonomic problems due to phenotypic similarities within the genus and high intraspecific variation. Extensive karyotypic variation has been noted, however, with diploid numbers (2n) ranging from 14 to 62 chromosomes. Some heteromorphism can be found, and 57 different karyotypes have been described to date.ResultsIn the present work, we describe a cytotype with a very low 2n. Specimens ofProechimyscf.longicaudatuswere collected from two different places in northern Mato Grosso state, Brazil (12°54″S, 52°22″W and 9°51′17″S, 58°14′53″W). The females and males had 16 and 17 chromosomes, respectively; all chromosomes were acrocentric, with the exception of the X chromosome, which was bi-armed. The sex chromosome system was found to be XY1Y2, originating from a Robertsonian rearrangement involving the X and a large acrocentric autosome. Females had two Neo-X chromosomes, and males had one Neo-X and two Y chromosomes. NOR staining was found in the interstitial region of one autosomal pair.ConclusionsComparison of this karyotype with those described in the literature revealed thatProechimyswith similar karyotypes had previously been collected from nearby localities. We therefore suggest that thisProechimysbelongs to a different taxon, and is either a new species or one that requires reassessment.