Published in

Future Medicine, Biomarkers in Medicine, 2(10), p. 197-208, 2016

DOI: 10.2217/bmm.15.119

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

CRP and a biomarker of type I collagen degradation, C1M, can differentiate anti-inflammatory treatment response in ankylosing spondylitis

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Aim: To investigate if tissue turnover biomarkers were efficacy biomarkers in ankylosing spondylitis and if the biomarkers at baseline predicted a good outcome (BASDAI50). Patients & methods: Twenty-two etanercept treated ankylosing spondylitis patients were investigated for inflammation (CRP, ESR, CRPM) and tissue turnover (C1M, C2M, C3M) during the first year of treatment. Biomarkers profiles and treatment response were investigated. Results: ESR, CRP, BASDAI and C1M were decreased with treatment (p ≤ 0.04). C1M and CRP segregated patients into two populations predicting treatment efficacy. Conclusion: C1M and CRP were efficacy biomarkers and baseline biomarkers could select who benefited (by biomarkers) from treatment. C1M was not superior to CRP, but the biomarkers evaluate different pathologic events, indicating that C1M and CRP identify different events.