Published in

SAGE Publications, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2_suppl(8), p. 39-40, 2002

DOI: 10.1177/1357633x020080s217

SAGE Publications, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2(8), p. 39-40

DOI: 10.1258/135763302320301948

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Implementation of Telemedicine: The Problem of Evaluation

Journal article published in 2002 by Robert Harrison, Anne MacFarlane ORCID, Paul Wallace
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In the UK, few telemedicine applications have endured beyond the trial phase. It is commonly said that lack of evidence is responsible for the lack of implementation. This assumes that evidence will lead to implementation. Studies show that this is naive, especially in organizations like health-care systems, which are characterized by professional dominance. Furthermore, other research indicates that the nature of the changes experienced by clinicians in telemedicine experiments is sometimes limiting compared with conventional practice. This presents a dilemma for evaluation since it cannot reliably take place until a particular technique has become stable and accepted into the daily routine. A programme of selected case studies is recommended to develop knowledge of how telemedicine can become a taken-for-granted part of medical care.