Background Increased therapy has been linked to improvements in functional ability of people with stroke. Aim To determine the effectiveness of two alternative models of increased physiotherapy service delivery (seven-day week therapy or group circuit class therapy five days a week) to usual care. Method Three-armed randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcome. People admitted with a diagnosis of stroke, previously independently ambulant and with a moderate level of disability were recruited. ‘Usual care’ was individual physiotherapy provided five-days a week. Seven-day week therapy was usual care physiotherapy provided seven-days a week. Participants in the circuit class therapy arm of the trial received physiotherapy in group circuit classes in two 90-min sessions, five-days a week. Primary outcome was distance walked on the six-minute walk test at four-weeks post-randomization. Results Two hundred eighty-three participants were randomized; primary outcome data were available for 259 (92%). In the seven-day arm participants received an additional three hours of physiotherapy and thosein the circuit class armanadditional 22 h. There were no significant between-group differences at four-weeks in walking distance ( P = 0·72). Length of stay was shorter for seven-day (mean difference −2·9 days, 95% confidence interval −17·9 to 12·0) and circuit class participants (mean difference −9·2 days, 95% confidence interval −24·2 to 5·8) compared to usual care, but this was not significant. Conclusions Both seven-day therapy and group circuit class therapy increased physiotherapy time, but walking outcomes were equivalent to usual care.